[Answer] 89. Which of the following was the first to prohibit “conspiracies in restraint of trade”?

Answer: • The Sherman Act.
89. Which of the following was the first to prohibit “conspiracies in restraint of trade”?

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 (26 Stat. 209 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 – 7) is a United States antitrust law that prescribes the rule of free competition among those engaged in commerce that was passed by Congress under the presidency of Benjamin Harrison. It is …

United States (1971) the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protected against prior restraint — pre -publication censorship —in almost all cases. The Petition Clause protects the right to petition all branches and agencies of government for action.

Restraint of trade – Wikipedia

Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 – Wikipedia

Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 – Wikipedia

Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 – Wikipedia

The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 (Pub.L. 63–212 38 Stat. 730 enacted October 15 1914 codified at 15 U.S.C. §§ 12–27 29 U.S.C. §§ 52–53) was a part of United States antitrust law with the goal of adding further substance to the U.S. antitrust law regime; the Clayton Act sought to prevent anticompetitive practices in their incipiency.

The Civil Rights Act of 1866 (14 Stat. 27–30 enacted April 9 1866 reenacted 1870) was the first United States federal law to define citizenship and affirm that all citizens are equally protected by the law. It was mainly intended in the wake of the American Civil War to protect the civil rights of persons of African descent born in or brought to the United States.

History. The first legislation in Canada dealing with competition was first introduced in 1889. The legislation prohibited conspiracies and agreements by businesses in restraint of trade. Inspired by the American Sherman Antitrust Act the legislation was mostly incorporated into the Canadian Criminal Code two years later. In 1912 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the purpose of the …

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a landm…

Leave a Reply